Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/ftrace: fix a memory leak in stat tracing

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:33:40 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >  static int stat_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> >  {
> > -	struct trace_stat_list *l = list_entry(v, struct trace_stat_list, list);
> > -	return current_tracer.stat_show(s, l->stat);
> > +	struct trace_stat_list *entry =
> > +		list_entry(v, struct trace_stat_list, list);
> > +
> > +	return current_tracer.stat_show(s, entry->stat);
> >  }
> 
> Rather than jumping through weird 80-column hoops, one can just do:
> 
> 	struct trace_stat_list *entry;
> 
> 	...
> 
> 	entry = list_entry(v, struct trace_stat_list, list);

OK, this is Frederics work. I'll submit a separate clean up patch.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/