RE: [GIT PULL] block bits for 2.6.29-rc5
From: Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
Date: Fri Feb 20 2009 - 11:51:17 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jens Axboe [mailto:jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:41 AM
> To: Andrew Morton
> Cc: torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] block bits for 2.6.29-rc5
>
> On Thu, Feb 19 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:41:06 +0100
> > Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -3404,6 +3601,24 @@ static int __devinit
> cciss_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > > int dac, return_code;
> > > InquiryData_struct *inq_buff = NULL;
> > >
> > > + if (reset_devices) {
> > > + /* Reset the controller with a PCI power-cycle */
> > > + if (cciss_hard_reset_controller(pdev) ||
> cciss_reset_msi(pdev))
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + /* Some devices (notably the HP Smart Array 5i
> Controller)
> > > + need a little pause here */
> > > + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(30*HZ);
> >
> > little!
>
> That does qualify as the understatement of the day :-)
>
> > Perhaps we should do a printk("no, your machine is not dead") here.
>
> Perhaps we should shrink it to something a little more
> tolerable and put it in the noop loop instead. 30 seconds is insane...
Some of these controllers do take a long time to recover from the reset because the firmware has to re-initialize. The firmware guys claim that's only a few seconds but that's not true.
Granted, the 5i is old as dirt. Don't know how many are still out there running newer kernels.
-- mikem--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/