Re: [Bug #12610] sync-Regression in 2.6.28.2?

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday 21 February 2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:18PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12610
> > Subject		: sync-Regression in 2.6.28.2?
> > Submitter	: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date		: 2009-01-27 9:35 (19 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123304977706620&w=4
> 
> This fix for this has landed in mainline post 2.6.29-rc5, as commit
> 2acf2c.  The deadlock is technically not a regression but it was made
> *much* more likely to show up because of commit 31a1266: ("mm:
> write_cache_pages cyclic fix, which show up in 2.6.28.1").  
> 
> Commit 3a4c68 in mainline backs up the change made in 31a1266, so you
> probably won't see this much after 2.6.28.6 (when 3a4c68 was
> backported to 2.6.28.y), but we should get commit 2acf2c pushed to
> 2.6.28.x and 2.6.27.y to completely solve the deadlock problem.

Thanks for the update.

I'll close the bug since it's fixed in the mainline.  Please tell Greg which
patches to put into the -stable kernels.

Thanks,
Rafael


> 
> 						- Ted
> 
> 


-- 
Everyone knows that debugging is twice as hard as writing a program
in the first place.  So if you're as clever as you can be when you write it,
how will you ever debug it? --- Brian Kernighan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/