Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/stat: cleanups, latency

[Ingo Molnar]

* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Here are two patches for the stat tracing. I would also like to do 
> more work on the stat tracing to make it able to manage by itself 
> the entries for the tracers, ie: the memory allocation, accesses, 
> locking, releases, etc...
> 
> And the workqueue tracer would be a good base to work on it. Then 
> Ingo, if you pull this, could you please also merge tracing/core 
> into tracing/workqueue, so that I can continue the work with these 
> patches and prepare pull requests against tracing/workqueue. It 
> should be mergeable without conflicts, I just applied the raw 
> patches from this pull-request into tracing/workqueue and it was 
> fine.

sure, i've done that!

> The following changes since commit 5872144f64b34a5942f6b4acedc90b02de72c58b:
>   Li Zefan (1):
>         tracing/filters: fix off-by-one bug
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git
> 	tracing/core
> 
> Frederic Weisbecker (2):
>       tracing/stat: replace trace_stat_session by stat_session
>       tracing/stat: replace linked list by an rbtree for sorting
> 
>  kernel/trace/trace_stat.c |  166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

Pulled, thanks Frederic.

Note, i've rebased this on top of the tracing/workqueues topic and 
have merged both into tip:master. You can use tracing/stat as a Git 
basis. (assuming it survives today's testing in -tip without 
requiring a rebase)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/