Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/stat: cleanups, latency
From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Mon May 18 2009 - 10:09:59 EST
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:20:51AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here are two patches for the stat tracing. I would also like to do
> > more work on the stat tracing to make it able to manage by itself
> > the entries for the tracers, ie: the memory allocation, accesses,
> > locking, releases, etc...
> >
> > And the workqueue tracer would be a good base to work on it. Then
> > Ingo, if you pull this, could you please also merge tracing/core
> > into tracing/workqueue, so that I can continue the work with these
> > patches and prepare pull requests against tracing/workqueue. It
> > should be mergeable without conflicts, I just applied the raw
> > patches from this pull-request into tracing/workqueue and it was
> > fine.
>
> sure, i've done that!
>
> > The following changes since commit 5872144f64b34a5942f6b4acedc90b02de72c58b:
> > Li Zefan (1):
> > tracing/filters: fix off-by-one bug
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git
> > tracing/core
> >
> > Frederic Weisbecker (2):
> > tracing/stat: replace trace_stat_session by stat_session
> > tracing/stat: replace linked list by an rbtree for sorting
> >
> > kernel/trace/trace_stat.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> Pulled, thanks Frederic.
>
> Note, i've rebased this on top of the tracing/workqueues topic and
> have merged both into tip:master. You can use tracing/stat as a Git
> basis. (assuming it survives today's testing in -tip without
> requiring a rebase)
>
> Ingo
Ok, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/