Re: slab: setup allocators earlier in the boot sequence

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi Ben,

On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 18:40 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:45 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> 
> > The call-sites I fixed up are all boot code AFAICT. And I like I said,
> > we can't really _miss_ any of those places, they must be checking for
> > slab_is_available() _anyway_; otherwise they have no business using
> > kmalloc(). And note: all call-sites that _unconditionally_ use
> > kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL) are safe because they worked before.
> 
> No. The check for slab_is_available() can be levels higher, for example
> the vmalloc case. I'm sure I can find a whole bunch more :-) Besides
> I find the approach fragile, and it will suck for things that can be
> rightfully called also later on.

Yes, you're obviously right. I overlooked the fact that arch code have
their own special slab_is_available() heuristics (yikes!).

But are you happy with the two patches I posted so I can push them to
Linus?

			Pekka

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/