Re: slab: setup allocators earlier in the boot sequence

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:02 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Fair enough, but this can be done right down in the synchronous
> reclaim path in the page allocator. This will catch more cases
> of code using the page allocator directly, and should be not
> as hot as the slab allocator.
> 
Yes except that slab has explicit local_irq_enable() when __GFP_WAIT is
set so we also need to deal with that for the boot case.

But again, this is a lot less of an issue if you use my proposed patch
instead which just applies a mask of "forbidden" bits rather than a
conditional branch based on the system state. It will also allow for
more fine grained masking out if we decide, for example, that at some
stage we want to mask out GFP_IO etc...

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/