Re: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter tools: shorten names for events
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Date: Tue Jun 23 2009 - 19:00:34 EST
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 03:42 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > Note, branches are special - we dont really have 'branch loads',
> > branches are executions. 'Branches' and 'Branch-misses' are the
> > right term.
> > Do you agree?
> Event we used for (BPU, READ, ACCESS) is 'branch instructions retired'
> So 'branch loads' we mean 'branch instruction loaded and retired'
> I like all of them : 'branch loads', 'branch retired' or 'branches'
> Please let me know, which one is best option so that I can prepare the
Or if branches is special and following values are always invalid :
(BPU, WRITE, ACCESS)
(BPU, WRITE, MISS)
(BPU, PREFETCH, ACCESS)
(BPU, PREFTECH, MISS)
then can we move BPU to some other category from Hardware cache
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/