Re: [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardwarevectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > $ ./perf list shows vector events like :
> > 
> >   vec-adds OR add                          [Hardware vector event]
> >   vec-muls OR multiply                     [Hardware vector event]
> >   vec-divs OR divide                       [Hardware vector event]
> >   vec-idle-cycles OR vec-empty-cycles      [Hardware vector event]
> >   vec-stall-cycles OR vec-busy-cycles      [Hardware vector event]
> >   vec-ops OR vec-operations                [Hardware vector event]

btw., why does this printout SHOUT the 'or'? It's certainly not an 
important piece of information. Something like:

   vec-adds | add                          [Hardware vector event]
   vec-muls | multiply                     [Hardware vector event]
   vec-divs | divide                       [Hardware vector event]
   vec-idle-cycles | vec-empty-cycles      [Hardware vector event]
   vec-stall-cycles | vec-busy-cycles      [Hardware vector event]
   vec-ops | vec-operations                [Hardware vector event]

looks better on all levels.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/