Re: [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardwarevectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem

[Jaswinder Singh Rajput]

On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 11:30 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > $ ./perf list shows vector events like :
> > > 
> > >   vec-adds OR add                          [Hardware vector event]
> > >   vec-muls OR multiply                     [Hardware vector event]
> > >   vec-divs OR divide                       [Hardware vector event]
> > >   vec-idle-cycles OR vec-empty-cycles      [Hardware vector event]
> > >   vec-stall-cycles OR vec-busy-cycles      [Hardware vector event]
> > >   vec-ops OR vec-operations                [Hardware vector event]
> 
> btw., why does this printout SHOUT the 'or'? It's certainly not an 
> important piece of information. Something like:
> 
>    vec-adds | add                          [Hardware vector event]
>    vec-muls | multiply                     [Hardware vector event]
>    vec-divs | divide                       [Hardware vector event]
>    vec-idle-cycles | vec-empty-cycles      [Hardware vector event]
>    vec-stall-cycles | vec-busy-cycles      [Hardware vector event]
>    vec-ops | vec-operations                [Hardware vector event]
> 
> looks better on all levels.
> 

'OR' is also used for other events.
If this is the only issue, I request you to accept these 2 patches.

I will send incremental patch which will fix these 'OR's and also avoid
duplicating of these functions.

Thanks,
--
JSR

http://userweb.kernel.org/~jaswinder/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/