Re: [PATCH] Add a new VT mode which is like VT_PROCESS but doesn'trequire a VT_RELDISP ioctl call

[Alan Cox]

> Sorry if I was unclear - I wasn't talking about changing the value, I was
> just saying that VT_ACKACQ and VT_PROCESS_AUTO are used in different
> contexts, so it shouldn't matter that they have the same value. One thing
> that probably would be nice though would be to move the VT_ACKACQ define
> to a different place in vt.h (probably after the VT_RELDISP define).

That would just as well. It just needs to be obvious for future
maintainers that the overlap doesn't matter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/