Re: [PATCH] Add a new VT mode which is like VT_PROCESS but doesn'trequire a VT_RELDISP ioctl call

[Ari Entlich]

----- "Alan Cox" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That would just as well. It just needs to be obvious for future
> maintainers that the overlap doesn't matter

Alright, cool. Should I submit two patches (one for the define move
and one for the actual patch), or would one patch be fine?

Ari
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/