Re: [git patch] atang tree: fix 2.6.32 SSD performance regression

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Tuesday 23 February 2010 07:23:24 am Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > DISCLAIMER: the fact of getting patches merged into atang tree means
> > that from now on they will be getting updates for changes happening
> > in atang tree and it should not be treated as an indication regarding
> > decisions taken by 'upstream' kernel trees
> > 
> > 
> > Fix 2.6.32 regression bringing back the desired SSD performance.
> > 
> > [ 'upstream' may want to wait for a proper resolution, for atang tree
> >   performance of big non-ATA boxes owned by a very few people is not
> >   of such a big concern as a major regression on a commodity hardware ]
> 
> What is the point of this, other than continuing your past history of
> political tirades?

I worry that you may be reading too much into it -- I don't use Linus'
tree or linux-next tree any longer so the next kernel I would see fix
for the issue is most likely 2.6.34 and there is a little point from my
personal perspective in waiting for such long time..

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/