Re: [git patch] atang tree: fix 2.6.32 SSD performance regression

[Jens Axboe]

On Tue, Feb 23 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 07:23:24 am Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > DISCLAIMER: the fact of getting patches merged into atang tree means
> > > that from now on they will be getting updates for changes happening
> > > in atang tree and it should not be treated as an indication regarding
> > > decisions taken by 'upstream' kernel trees
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Fix 2.6.32 regression bringing back the desired SSD performance.
> > > 
> > > [ 'upstream' may want to wait for a proper resolution, for atang tree
> > >   performance of big non-ATA boxes owned by a very few people is not
> > >   of such a big concern as a major regression on a commodity hardware ]
> > 
> > What is the point of this, other than continuing your past history of
> > political tirades?
> 
> I worry that you may be reading too much into it -- I don't use Linus'
> tree or linux-next tree any longer so the next kernel I would see fix
> for the issue is most likely 2.6.34 and there is a little point from my
> personal perspective in waiting for such long time..

It'll go into 2.6.33, I already prepared an updated for-linus branch
this morning and will send it out later today.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/