Re: [patch] exofs: confusion between kmap() and kmap_atomic() api

[Boaz Harrosh]

On 05/11/2010 02:03 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 09 May 2010 13:16:38 +0300
> Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 05/07/2010 12:05 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> For kmap_atomic() we call kunmap_atomic() on the returned pointer.
>>> That's different from kmap() and kunmap() and so it's easy to get them
>>> backwards.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>
>> Thank you Dan, I'll push it ASAP. 
> 
>> Looks like a bad bug. So this is actually a leak, right? kunmap_atomic
>> would detect the bad pointer and do nothing?
> 
> void kunmap_atomic(void *kvaddr, enum km_type type)
> {
> 	unsigned long vaddr = (unsigned long) kvaddr & PAGE_MASK;
> 	enum fixed_addresses idx = type + KM_TYPE_NR*smp_processor_id();
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Force other mappings to Oops if they'll try to access this pte
> 	 * without first remap it.  Keeping stale mappings around is a bad idea
> 	 * also, in case the page changes cacheability attributes or becomes
> 	 * a protected page in a hypervisor.
> 	 */
> 	if (vaddr == __fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_BEGIN+idx))
> 		kpte_clear_flush(kmap_pte-idx, vaddr);
> 	else {
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM
> 		BUG_ON(vaddr < PAGE_OFFSET);
> 		BUG_ON(vaddr >= (unsigned long)high_memory);
> #endif
> 	}
> 
> 	pagefault_enable();
> }
> 
> if CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM=y, kunmap_atomic() will go BUG.
> 
> if CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM=n, kunmap_atomic() will do nothing, leaving the
> pte pointing at the old page.  Next time someone tries to use that
> kmap_atomic() slot,
> 
> void *kmap_atomic_prot(struct page *page, enum km_type type, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> 	enum fixed_addresses idx;
> 	unsigned long vaddr;
> 
> 	/* even !CONFIG_PREEMPT needs this, for in_atomic in do_page_fault */
> 	pagefault_disable();
> 
> 	if (!PageHighMem(page))
> 		return page_address(page);
> 
> 	debug_kmap_atomic(type);
> 
> 	idx = type + KM_TYPE_NR*smp_processor_id();
> 	vaddr = __fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_BEGIN + idx);
> 	BUG_ON(!pte_none(*(kmap_pte-idx)));
> 	set_pte(kmap_pte-idx, mk_pte(page, prot));
> 
> 	return (void *)vaddr;
> }
> 
> kmap_atomic_prot() will go BUG because the pte wasn't cleared.
> 
> 
> I can only assume that this code has never been run on i386. I'd suggest
> adding a "Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>" to the changelog if you have
> expectations that anyone will try to run it on i386.
> 

Right! Everyone I know runs 64bit. I will add the Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
to the patch. Thanks.

Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/