RE: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_maskparameter for tps6586x_set_bits()

[Gary King]

The patch seems fine.

- Gary
________________________________________
From: Liam Girdwood [lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 2:53 AM
To: Mike Rapoport
Cc: Mark Brown; Gary King; Axel Lin; linux-kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask parameter for tps6586x_set_bits()

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:09 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:42:42PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> >> The third parameter of tps6586x_set_bits() is the bit_mask,
> >> thus we should use (1 << ri->go_bit) instead of ri->go_bit.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > but I'd be much happier if someone who actually has the hardware could
> > verify that this is OK.
>
> I don't have the hardware handy at the moment.
> Gary, can you please verify the fix?
>

Do we have any news on this testing ? I'd like to have these upstream
for rc3.

Thanks

Liam
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/