Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_maskparameter for tps6586x_set_bits()

[Gary King]

Sorry, I must have missed the original e-mail.

I'll give it a try either later today or tomorrow, after I 
context-switch back to my dev system that uses the tps6586x driver.

- Gary

On 08/25/2010 02:53 AM, Liam Girdwood wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:09 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:42:42PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> > >> The third parameter of tps6586x_set_bits() is the bit_mask,
> > >> thus we should use (1 << ri->go_bit) instead of ri->go_bit.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > but I'd be much happier if someone who actually has the hardware could
> > > verify that this is OK.
> >
> > I don't have the hardware handy at the moment.
> > Gary, can you please verify the fix?
> >
>
> Do we have any news on this testing ? I'd like to have these upstream
> for rc3.
>
> Thanks
>
> Liam
> --
> Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
> ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
> http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
>
¢éì®&Þ~º&¶¬–+-±éÝ¥Šw®žË±Êâmébžìdz¹Þ)í…æèw*jg¬±¨¶‰šŽŠÝj/êäz¹ÞŠà2ŠÞ¨è­Ú&¢)ß«a¶Úþø®G«éh®æj:+v‰¨Šwè†Ù>Wš±êÞiÛaxPjØm¶ŸÿÃ-»+ƒùdš_