Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>

[Guenter Roeck]

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:34:18PM -0400, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 20:29 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 07:13:40PM -0400, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Convert printks to pr_<level>
> > > Coalesce long formats
> > > Removed prefixes from formats
> > > Added #define pr_fmt KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > > Standardized abitguru messages for reporting and finding MAINTAINER
> > > Compiled x86 allyesconfig only.
> > > I inspected "strings drivers/hwmon/built-in.o",
> > > but it's otherwise untested.
> > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > There are several lines longer than 80 characters.
> > Does this rule no longer apply ?
> 
> 80 columns isn't checked for printk format strings.
> 
Interesting.

> A kernel general preference may be to keep formats as
> a single string without line breaks so that grep works
> better.
> 
> > Oddly enough, there are only four checkpatch warnings about long lines,
> > even though there are many more.
> 
> The version I use doesn't show any warnings.
> 
checkpatch.pl from both v2.6.36-rc7 and v2.6.36-rc6 do report warnings.
Looks like those versions flag long lines for pr_warn. Is your version
older or newer ?

Anyway, would it be possible to split the patch into one patch per file ?

I don't know how Jean thinks about it, but in my opinion it would be cleaner,
permit revert on a single patch/file instead of having to revert the entire series,
it would simplify review, and it would make it much easier to cherry-pick 
pieces into other releases if needed.

Thanks,
Guenter 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/