Re: [PATCH UPDATED 4/9] x86: Initialize 32bit logical apicid mappingearly during boot

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Fri Nov 12 2010 - 05:00:39 EST


On 11/12/2010 01:38 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On x86_32, non-standard logical apicid mapping can be used by
> different NUMA setups and the mapping is queried while bringing up
> each CPU using apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() to build
> cpu_2_logical_apicid[] array. The logical apicid is then used to
> deliver IPIs and determine NUMA configuration.
>
> Unfortunately, initializing at SMP bring up is too late for percpu
> setup making static percpu variables setup w/o considering NUMA. This
> also is different from how x86_64 is configured making the code
> difficult to follow and maintain.
>
> This patch updates logical apicid mapping handling such that,
>
> * early_percpu variable x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid replaces
> cpu_2_logical_apicid[].
>
> * apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() is called once during get_smp_config()
> and the output is recorded in x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid.
>
> * apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() is allowed to return BAD_APICID if it
> can't determine the value that early during boot. In this case, the
> mapping will be initialized during SMP bring up by reading APIC LDR
> as before.
>
> - Brian Gerst spotted that setup_per_cpu_areas() was not copying the
> early x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid to the permanent percpu area and
> es7000_32 is using per_cpu() instead of early_per_cpu(), which in
> itself is not incorrect as they're never used before setup_per_cpu()
> but still confusing. Both updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Updated as per Brian's comment. The rest of the patchset apply okay
> on top of this change. The git tree is updated accordingly.
>
> Thanks.
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/bigsmp_32.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/es7000_32.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c | 8 ++++----
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c | 15 +++++++--------
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/summit_32.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 7 +++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 10 +++-------
> 10 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
> Index: work/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ work/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -1202,6 +1207,7 @@ static void __cpuinit lapic_setup_esr(vo
> */
> void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void)
> {
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> unsigned int value, queued;
> int i, j, acked = 0;
> unsigned long long tsc = 0, ntsc;
> @@ -1343,21 +1362,19 @@ void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void)
> * TODO: set up through-local-APIC from through-I/O-APIC? --macro
> */
> value = apic_read(APIC_LVT0) & APIC_LVT_MASKED;
> - if (!smp_processor_id() && (pic_mode || !value)) {
> + if (!cpu && (pic_mode || !value)) {
> value = APIC_DM_EXTINT;
> - apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "enabled ExtINT on CPU#%d\n",
> - smp_processor_id());
> + apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "enabled ExtINT on CPU#%d\n", cpu);
> } else {
> value = APIC_DM_EXTINT | APIC_LVT_MASKED;
> - apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "masked ExtINT on CPU#%d\n",
> - smp_processor_id());
> + apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "masked ExtINT on CPU#%d\n", cpu);
> }
> apic_write(APIC_LVT0, value);
>
> /*
> * only the BP should see the LINT1 NMI signal, obviously.
> */
> - if (!smp_processor_id())
> + if (!cpu)
> value = APIC_DM_NMI;
> else
> value = APIC_DM_NMI | APIC_LVT_MASKED;
> @@ -1369,7 +1386,7 @@ void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL
> /* Recheck CMCI information after local APIC is up on CPU #0 */
> - if (smp_processor_id() == 0)
> + if (cpu == 0)
> cmci_recheck();
> #endif
> }

those replacing smp_processor_id() with cpu should be in another patch.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/