Re: Sensor event related attribute naming.

[Hemanth V]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hemanth V" <hemanthv@xxxxxx>
To: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>; "Dmitry Torokhov" <dtor@xxxxxxx>


> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Sensor event related attribute naming.
>
>
> > Given the lack of further comment, I went ahead and implemented the above 
> > naming
> > scheme for IIO. As the above discussion with Hemanth shows, there are 
> > some corner cases
> > that will need futher thought in the future.
>
> Jonathan, haven't seen many comments on this. Do u think the reason
> might be that these interfaces are hidden behind a HAL layer like in 
> android and
> might not be a burning issue for many people.

Dmitry, could you let us know your thoughts on this too.
Would using a HAL layer be better compared to creating a standard
sysfs interface, as it seems to be the popular approach.

Thanks
Hemanth 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/