Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] cgroup: add per cgroup timer_slack_ns

[Paul Menage]

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:45 PM, jacob pan
<jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I guess timer_slack_ns alone cannot qualify for a new subsystem,

I think that it's providing a sufficiently different control from
existing subsystems that making it a separate subsystem is reasonable.
The cpuset subsystem definitely doesn't sound like the right place,
since it's more dealing with numa isolation/policy. The cpu subsystem
could be, since it also deals with scheduling stuff.

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/