Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6] sd: implement sd_check_events()

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Tue Dec 21 2010 - 14:19:21 EST


On 2010-12-21 19:09, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 10:20 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
>> Added cc: linux-scsi
>>
>> On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 18:42 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Replace sd_media_change() with sd_check_events().
>>>
>>> * Move media removed logic into set_media_not_present() and
>>> media_not_present() and set sdev->changed iff an existing media is
>>> removed or the device indicates UNIT_ATTENTION.
>>>
>>> * Make sd_check_events() sets sdev->changed if previously missing
>>> media becomes present.
>>>
>>> * Event is reported only if sdev->changed is set.
>>>
>>> This makes media presence event reported if scsi_disk->media_present
>>> actually changed or the device indicated UNIT_ATTENTION. For backward
>>> compatibility, SDEV_EVT_MEDIA_CHANGE is generated each time
>>> sd_check_events() detects media change event.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Here it is. The conflicts were due to Alan's recent patch, which was
>>> in the similar direction anyway.
>>
>> This looks fine to me. Jens can you strip the SCSI patches out of your
>> tree and I'll run them through a postmerge tree to get the fix up?
>
> Ping on this, please: I can't build a postmerge tree until block is
> sorted out. I need these four removing:

I would need to revert those four then, I can't rebase any of those
branches.


--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/