Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6] sd: implement sd_check_events()

[James Bottomley]

On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 20:19 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2010-12-21 19:09, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 10:20 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> Added cc: linux-scsi
> >>
> >> On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 18:42 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>> Replace sd_media_change() with sd_check_events().
> >>>
> >>> * Move media removed logic into set_media_not_present() and
> >>>   media_not_present() and set sdev->changed iff an existing media is
> >>>   removed or the device indicates UNIT_ATTENTION.
> >>>
> >>> * Make sd_check_events() sets sdev->changed if previously missing
> >>>   media becomes present.
> >>>
> >>> * Event is reported only if sdev->changed is set.
> >>>
> >>> This makes media presence event reported if scsi_disk->media_present
> >>> actually changed or the device indicated UNIT_ATTENTION.  For backward
> >>> compatibility, SDEV_EVT_MEDIA_CHANGE is generated each time
> >>> sd_check_events() detects media change event.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> Here it is.  The conflicts were due to Alan's recent patch, which was
> >>> in the similar direction anyway.
> >>
> >> This looks fine to me.  Jens can you strip the SCSI patches out of your
> >> tree and I'll run them through a postmerge tree to get the fix up?
> > 
> > Ping on this, please: I can't build a postmerge tree until block is
> > sorted out.  I need these four removing:
> 
> I would need to revert those four then, I can't rebase any of those
> branches.

That's a bit unfortunate.  OK, just revert the sd one then.  Hopefully
we're close enough to the merge window that we won't pick up conflicts
in the others.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/