Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm/omap: use system_wq in mailbox

[Tejun Heo]

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:24:21AM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Using dedicated workqueue or system_wq doesn't make any difference in
> terms of execution latency anymore.  Sleeping work items no longer
> delay execution of other work items.  If mailbox is very latency
> sensitive, it might make sense to create a HIGHPRI workqueue but that
> usually isn't necessary.

Ping.  Shall I apply the patch?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/