Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm/omap: use system_wq in mailbox

[Hari Kanigeri]

Tejun,

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:24:21AM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Using dedicated workqueue or system_wq doesn't make any difference in
>> terms of execution latency anymore.  Sleeping work items no longer
>> delay execution of other work items.  If mailbox is very latency
>> sensitive, it might make sense to create a HIGHPRI workqueue but that
>> usually isn't necessary.
>
> Ping.  Shall I apply the patch?
>
I am sorry for the delay in acking your response.  Your patch looks good to me.

thank you,
best regards,
Hari
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/