Re: [PATCH 1/2] Issue NETDEV_CHANGE notification when bridge changesstate

[AmÃrico Wang]

On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 11:18:33PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
>
>IPv6 address autoconfiguration relies on an UP interface to processes
>traffic normally. A bridge that is UP enters LEARNING state and this
>state "eats" any Router Advertising packets sent to the
>bridge. Issuing a NETDEV_CHANGE notification on the bridge interface
>when it changes state allows autoconfiguration code to retry
>querying router information.
>
...

>+static void br_port_change_notifier_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>+{
>+	struct net_bridge *br = container_of(work,
>+					     struct net_bridge,
>+					     change_notification_worker);
>+
>+	rtnl_lock();
>+	netdev_state_change(br->dev);
>+	rtnl_unlock();
>+}
>+

Do you really want user-space to get this notification too?
Why do you put it into a workqueue? Maybe it has to be called in
process-context?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/