RE: [PATCH 01/13] input: touchscreen: use polling mode in 88pm860x

From: Haojian Zhuang
Date: Thu Apr 14 2011 - 10:44:09 EST

Next message: Samuel Ortiz: "Re: [RFC] NFC subsystem prototype"
Previous message: Axel Lin: "[PATCH] mfd: asic3: Fix build error"
In reply to: Wanlong Gao: "Re: [PATCH 01/13] input: touchscreen: use polling mode in 88pm860x"
Next in thread: Wanlong Gao: "Re: [PATCH 01/13] input: touchscreen: use polling mode in 88pm860x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: gaowanlong@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:gaowanlong@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>Wanlong Gao
>Sent: 2011年4月14日 10:02 PM
>To: Haojian Zhuang
>Cc: sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxx; linux-
>kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dmitry Torokhov
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] input: touchscreen: use polling mode in
>88pm860x
>
>On 4/13/11, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Measuring point on touchscreen with IRQ mode can only monitor pen-down
>> event. If finger is moving on touchscreen, it can't be monitored by
>> IRQ pen-down event. So switch to polling mode after pen-down event.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/input/touchscreen/88pm860x-ts.c | 82
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/88pm860x-ts.c
>> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/88pm860x-ts.c
>> index b3aebc2..fe12f61 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/88pm860x-ts.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/88pm860x-ts.c
>> @@ -12,13 +12,25 @@
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/i2c.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/input.h>
>> #include <linux/mfd/88pm860x.h>
>> -#include <linux/slab.h>
>>
>> #define MEAS_LEN (8)
>> #define ACCURATE_BIT (12)
>>
>> +/*
>> + * While 32KHz hardware timer is used for scheduler, we always assign
>HZ
>> + * to 128. It means that 1 tick costs 7.8msec.
>> + */
>> +#define MEASURE_INTERVAL_MS (7)
>> +
>> +/* debounce register */
>> +#define DEBOUNCE (0x0A)
>> +
>> +#define PD_DEBOUNCE_0MSEC (0)
>> +#define PD_DEBOUNCE_MASK (3)
>> +
>> /* touch register */
>> #define MEAS_EN3 (0x52)
>>
>> @@ -39,22 +51,27 @@
>> #define MEAS_TSIZ2_EN (1 << 7)
>>
>> struct pm860x_touch {
>> - struct input_dev *idev;
>> - struct i2c_client *i2c;
>> - struct pm860x_chip *chip;
>> - int irq;
>> - int res_x; /* resistor of Xplate */
>> + struct input_dev *idev;
>> + struct i2c_client *i2c;
>> + struct pm860x_chip *chip;
>> + struct delayed_work poll_work;
>> + struct mutex lock;
>> +
>> + int irq;
>> + int res_x; /* resistor of Xplate */
>> };
>>
>> -static irqreturn_t pm860x_touch_handler(int irq, void *data)
>> +static void pm860x_poll_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> - struct pm860x_touch *touch = data;
>> + struct pm860x_touch *touch = container_of(work, struct
>pm860x_touch,
>> + poll_work.work);
>> struct pm860x_chip *chip = touch->chip;
>> + int x, y, z1, z2, rt = 0;
>> + int ret, pen_down, interval;
>> unsigned char buf[MEAS_LEN];
>> - int x, y, pen_down;
>> - int z1, z2, rt = 0;
>> - int ret;
>> + struct timeval start, end;
>>
>> + do_gettimeofday(&start);
>> ret = pm860x_bulk_read(touch->i2c, MEAS_TSIX_1, MEAS_LEN, buf);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto out;
>> @@ -77,30 +94,54 @@ static irqreturn_t pm860x_touch_handler(int irq,
>void
>> *data)
>> input_report_abs(touch->idev, ABS_PRESSURE, rt);
>> input_report_key(touch->idev, BTN_TOUCH, 1);
>> dev_dbg(chip->dev, "pen down at [%d, %d].\n", x, y);
>> +
>> + do_gettimeofday(&end);
>> + interval = (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) * 1000000 +
>> + (end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec) / 1000;
>Is the interval you calibrated right ?

Good catch. I'll fix it.

>> + interval = (interval < MEASURE_INTERVAL_MS)
>> + ? (MEASURE_INTERVAL_MS - interval) : 0;
>> + schedule_delayed_work(&touch->poll_work,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(interval));
>> } else {
>> input_report_abs(touch->idev, ABS_PRESSURE, 0);
>> input_report_key(touch->idev, BTN_TOUCH, 0);
>> dev_dbg(chip->dev, "pen release\n");
>> + mutex_unlock(&touch->lock);
>> }
>> input_sync(touch->idev);
>>
>> out:
>> + return;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t pm860x_touch_handler(int irq, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct pm860x_touch *touch = data;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = pm860x_reg_read(touch->i2c, PM8607_STATUS_1);
>> + dev_dbg(touch->chip->dev, "pen status:%d\n", (ret &
>PM8607_STATUS_PEN)
>> + ? 1 : 0);
>> + if ((ret & PM8607_STATUS_PEN) == 0)
>prefer to !(ret & PM8607_STATUS_PEN) ?
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&touch->lock);
>> + pm860x_poll_work(&touch->poll_work.work);
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>>
>> static int pm860x_touch_open(struct input_dev *dev)
>> {
>> struct pm860x_touch *touch = input_get_drvdata(dev);
>> - int data, ret;
>> + int data;
>>
>> + /* set debounce time with 0ms */
>> + pm860x_set_bits(touch->i2c, DEBOUNCE, PD_DEBOUNCE_MASK,
>> + PD_DEBOUNCE_0MSEC);
>> data = MEAS_PD_EN | MEAS_TSIX_EN | MEAS_TSIY_EN
>> | MEAS_TSIZ1_EN | MEAS_TSIZ2_EN;
>> - ret = pm860x_set_bits(touch->i2c, MEAS_EN3, data, data);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> - goto out;
>> + pm860x_set_bits(touch->i2c, MEAS_EN3, data, data);
>Why not check the return value now ?

Seems checking is better in open(). I'll fix it.

>> return 0;
>> -out:
>> - return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static void pm860x_touch_close(struct input_dev *dev)
>> @@ -152,16 +193,17 @@ static int __devinit pm860x_touch_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> touch->idev->name = "88pm860x-touch";
>> - touch->idev->phys = "88pm860x/input0";
>> + touch->idev->phys = "88pm860x/input1";
>> touch->idev->id.bustype = BUS_I2C;
>> touch->idev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>> touch->idev->open = pm860x_touch_open;
>> touch->idev->close = pm860x_touch_close;
>> touch->chip = chip;
>> touch->i2c = (chip->id == CHIP_PM8607) ? chip->client : chip-
>>companion;
>> - touch->irq = irq + chip->irq_base;
>> + touch->irq = irq;
>> touch->res_x = pdata->res_x;
>> input_set_drvdata(touch->idev, touch);
>> + mutex_init(&touch->lock);
>>
>> ret = request_threaded_irq(touch->irq, NULL, pm860x_touch_handler,
>> IRQF_ONESHOT, "touch", touch);
>> @@ -188,6 +230,7 @@ static int __devinit pm860x_touch_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, touch);
>> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&touch->poll_work, pm860x_poll_work);
>> return 0;
>> out_rg:
>> free_irq(touch->irq, touch);
>> @@ -202,6 +245,7 @@ static int __devexit pm860x_touch_remove(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct pm860x_touch *touch = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>
>> + flush_scheduled_work();
>> input_unregister_device(touch->idev);
>> free_irq(touch->irq, touch);
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>> --
>> 1.5.6.5
>>
>Best regards
>Thanks
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
>kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
㈤旃??????+-遍荻?w??笔???dz罐??骅w*jg??????/??罐????璀??摺?囤??????:+v???佶>W?贽i?xPj???-?+?d?

Next message: Samuel Ortiz: "Re: [RFC] NFC subsystem prototype"
Previous message: Axel Lin: "[PATCH] mfd: asic3: Fix build error"
In reply to: Wanlong Gao: "Re: [PATCH 01/13] input: touchscreen: use polling mode in 88pm860x"
Next in thread: Wanlong Gao: "Re: [PATCH 01/13] input: touchscreen: use polling mode in 88pm860x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]