Re: [PATCH 01/13] input: touchscreen: use polling mode in 88pm860x

[Wanlong Gao]

2011-4-14 22:41, Haojian Zhuang wroted:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gaowanlong@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:gaowanlong@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>> Wanlong Gao
>> Sent: 2011年4月14日 10:02 PM
>> To: Haojian Zhuang
>> Cc: sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxx; linux-
>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dmitry Torokhov
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] input: touchscreen: use polling mode in
>> 88pm860x
>>
>> On 4/13/11, Haojian Zhuang<haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>> Measuring point on touchscreen with IRQ mode can only monitor pen-down
>>> event. If finger is moving on touchscreen, it can't be monitored by
>>> IRQ pen-down event. So switch to polling mode after pen-down event.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang<haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by:Wanlong Gao<wanlong.gao@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/input/touchscreen/88pm860x-ts.c |   82
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>   1 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/88pm860x-ts.c
>>> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/88pm860x-ts.c
>>> index b3aebc2..fe12f61 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/88pm860x-ts.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/88pm860x-ts.c
>>> @@ -12,13 +12,25 @@
>>>   #include<linux/module.h>
>>>   #include<linux/platform_device.h>
>>>   #include<linux/i2c.h>
>>> +#include<linux/slab.h>
>>>   #include<linux/input.h>
>>>   #include<linux/mfd/88pm860x.h>
>>> -#include<linux/slab.h>
>>>
>>>   #define MEAS_LEN		(8)
>>>   #define ACCURATE_BIT		(12)
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * While 32KHz hardware timer is used for scheduler, we always assign
>> HZ
>>> + * to 128. It means that 1 tick costs 7.8msec.
>>> + */
>>> +#define MEASURE_INTERVAL_MS	(7)
>>> +
>>> +/* debounce register */
>>> +#define DEBOUNCE		(0x0A)
>>> +
>>> +#define PD_DEBOUNCE_0MSEC	(0)
>>> +#define PD_DEBOUNCE_MASK	(3)
>>> +
>>>   /* touch register */
>>>   #define MEAS_EN3		(0x52)
>>>
>>> @@ -39,22 +51,27 @@
>>>   #define MEAS_TSIZ2_EN		(1<<  7)
>>>
>>>   struct pm860x_touch {
>>> -	struct input_dev *idev;
>>> -	struct i2c_client *i2c;
>>> -	struct pm860x_chip *chip;
>>> -	int irq;
>>> -	int res_x;		/* resistor of Xplate */
>>> +	struct input_dev	*idev;
>>> +	struct i2c_client	*i2c;
>>> +	struct pm860x_chip	*chip;
>>> +	struct delayed_work	poll_work;
>>> +	struct mutex		lock;
>>> +
>>> +	int			irq;
>>> +	int			res_x;		/* resistor of Xplate */
>>>   };
>>>
>>> -static irqreturn_t pm860x_touch_handler(int irq, void *data)
>>> +static void pm860x_poll_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>>   {
>>> -	struct pm860x_touch *touch = data;
>>> +	struct pm860x_touch *touch = container_of(work, struct
>> pm860x_touch,
>>> +						  poll_work.work);
>>>   	struct pm860x_chip *chip = touch->chip;
>>> +	int x, y, z1, z2, rt = 0;
>>> +	int ret, pen_down, interval;
>>>   	unsigned char buf[MEAS_LEN];
>>> -	int x, y, pen_down;
>>> -	int z1, z2, rt = 0;
>>> -	int ret;
>>> +	struct timeval start, end;
>>>
>>> +	do_gettimeofday(&start);
>>>   	ret = pm860x_bulk_read(touch->i2c, MEAS_TSIX_1, MEAS_LEN, buf);
>>>   	if (ret<  0)
>>>   		goto out;
>>> @@ -77,30 +94,54 @@ static irqreturn_t pm860x_touch_handler(int irq,
>> void
>>> *data)
>>>   		input_report_abs(touch->idev, ABS_PRESSURE, rt);
>>>   		input_report_key(touch->idev, BTN_TOUCH, 1);
>>>   		dev_dbg(chip->dev, "pen down at [%d, %d].\n", x, y);
>>> +
>>> +		do_gettimeofday(&end);
>>> +		interval = (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) * 1000000 +
>>> +			(end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec) / 1000;
>> Is the interval you calibrated right ?
> 
> Good catch. I'll fix it.
Glad.
> 
>>> +		interval = (interval<  MEASURE_INTERVAL_MS)
>>> +			? (MEASURE_INTERVAL_MS - interval) : 0;
>>> +		schedule_delayed_work(&touch->poll_work,
>>> +				      msecs_to_jiffies(interval));
>>>   	} else {
>>>   		input_report_abs(touch->idev, ABS_PRESSURE, 0);
>>>   		input_report_key(touch->idev, BTN_TOUCH, 0);
>>>   		dev_dbg(chip->dev, "pen release\n");
>>> +		mutex_unlock(&touch->lock);
>>>   	}
>>>   	input_sync(touch->idev);
>>>
>>>   out:
>>> +	return;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static irqreturn_t pm860x_touch_handler(int irq, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct pm860x_touch *touch = data;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	ret = pm860x_reg_read(touch->i2c, PM8607_STATUS_1);
>>> +	dev_dbg(touch->chip->dev, "pen status:%d\n", (ret&
>> PM8607_STATUS_PEN)
>>> +		? 1 : 0);
>>> +	if ((ret&  PM8607_STATUS_PEN) == 0)
>> prefer to  !(ret&  PM8607_STATUS_PEN) ?
>>> +		return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&touch->lock);
>>> +	pm860x_poll_work(&touch->poll_work.work);
>>>   	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   static int pm860x_touch_open(struct input_dev *dev)
>>>   {
>>>   	struct pm860x_touch *touch = input_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> -	int data, ret;
>>> +	int data;
>>>
>>> +	/* set debounce time with 0ms */
>>> +	pm860x_set_bits(touch->i2c, DEBOUNCE, PD_DEBOUNCE_MASK,
>>> +			PD_DEBOUNCE_0MSEC);
>>>   	data = MEAS_PD_EN | MEAS_TSIX_EN | MEAS_TSIY_EN
>>>   		| MEAS_TSIZ1_EN | MEAS_TSIZ2_EN;
>>> -	ret = pm860x_set_bits(touch->i2c, MEAS_EN3, data, data);
>>> -	if (ret<  0)
>>> -		goto out;
>>> +	pm860x_set_bits(touch->i2c, MEAS_EN3, data, data);
>> Why not check the return value now ?
> 
> Seems checking is better in open(). I'll fix it.
Glad.
> 
>>>   	return 0;
>>> -out:
>>> -	return ret;
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   static void pm860x_touch_close(struct input_dev *dev)
>>> @@ -152,16 +193,17 @@ static int __devinit pm860x_touch_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>   	}
>>>
>>>   	touch->idev->name = "88pm860x-touch";
>>> -	touch->idev->phys = "88pm860x/input0";
>>> +	touch->idev->phys = "88pm860x/input1";
>>>   	touch->idev->id.bustype = BUS_I2C;
>>>   	touch->idev->dev.parent =&pdev->dev;
>>>   	touch->idev->open = pm860x_touch_open;
>>>   	touch->idev->close = pm860x_touch_close;
>>>   	touch->chip = chip;
>>>   	touch->i2c = (chip->id == CHIP_PM8607) ? chip->client : chip-
>>> companion;
>>> -	touch->irq = irq + chip->irq_base;
>>> +	touch->irq = irq;
>>>   	touch->res_x = pdata->res_x;
>>>   	input_set_drvdata(touch->idev, touch);
>>> +	mutex_init(&touch->lock);
>>>
>>>   	ret = request_threaded_irq(touch->irq, NULL, pm860x_touch_handler,
>>>   				   IRQF_ONESHOT, "touch", touch);
>>> @@ -188,6 +230,7 @@ static int __devinit pm860x_touch_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>   	}
>>>
>>>   	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, touch);
>>> +	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&touch->poll_work, pm860x_poll_work);
>>>   	return 0;
>>>   out_rg:
>>>   	free_irq(touch->irq, touch);
>>> @@ -202,6 +245,7 @@ static int __devexit pm860x_touch_remove(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>   {
>>>   	struct pm860x_touch *touch = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>
>>> +	flush_scheduled_work();
>>>   	input_unregister_device(touch->idev);
>>>   	free_irq(touch->irq, touch);
>>>   	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>>> --
>>> 1.5.6.5
>>>
>> Best regards
>> Thanks
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
>> kernel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/