Re: Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S)

[Rusty Russell]

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:33:51 +0300, Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2)I think that xen doesn't use any more the hardware subarch boot
> parameter, and uses a 'different' path/boot sequence, hence the
> xen_entry in head_32.S is not needed any more. Am I missing something?

Yep, Xen never actually used it.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/