Re: Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Fri Apr 15 2011 - 10:19:33 EST
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:40:05PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:33:51 +0300, Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 2)I think that xen doesn't use any more the hardware subarch boot
> > parameter, and uses a 'different' path/boot sequence, hence the
> > xen_entry in head_32.S is not needed any more. Am I missing something?
> Yep, Xen never actually used it.
Does lguest use it? It looked like a neat idea - what happened?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/