Re: [PATCH] mm: Delete non-atomic mm counter implementation
From: Matt Fleming
Date: Wed Apr 27 2011 - 11:09:48 EST
[Oops! Replying with the correct linux-mm address]
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:36:05 +0100
Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The problem with having two different types of counters is that
> developers adding new code need to keep in mind whether it's safe to
> use both the atomic and non-atomic implementations. For example, when
> adding new callers of the *_mm_counter() functions a developer needs
> to ensure that those paths are always executed with page_table_lock
> held, in case we're using the non-atomic implementation of mm
> counters.
>
> Hugh Dickins introduced the atomic mm counters in commit f412ac08c986
> ("[PATCH] mm: fix rss and mmlist locking"). When asked why he left the
> non-atomic counters around he said,
>
> | The only reason was to avoid adding costly atomic operations into a
> | configuration that had no need for them there: the page_table_lock
> | sufficed.
> |
> | Certainly it would be simpler just to delete the non-atomic variant.
> |
> | And I think it's fair to say that any configuration on which we're
> | measuring performance to that degree (rather than "does it boot fast?"
> | type measurements), would already be going the split ptlocks route.
>
> Removing the non-atomic counters eases the maintenance burden because
> developers no longer have to mindful of the two implementations when
> using *_mm_counter().
>
> Note that all architectures provide a means of atomically updating
> atomic_long_t variables, even if they have to revert to the generic
> spinlock implementation because they don't support 64-bit atomic
> instructions (see lib/atomic64.c).
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Dave, you might want to take this into your pagetable counters series
> so that you only need to worry about atomic mm counters.
>
> include/linux/mm.h | 44 +++++++-------------------------------------
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 9 +++------
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index dd87a78..ee64af2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1034,65 +1034,35 @@ int __get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write,
> /*
> * per-process(per-mm_struct) statistics.
> */
> -#if defined(SPLIT_RSS_COUNTING)
> -/*
> - * The mm counters are not protected by its page_table_lock,
> - * so must be incremented atomically.
> - */
> static inline void set_mm_counter(struct mm_struct *mm, int member, long value)
> {
> atomic_long_set(&mm->rss_stat.count[member], value);
> }
>
> +#if defined(SPLIT_RSS_COUNTING)
> unsigned long get_mm_counter(struct mm_struct *mm, int member);
> -
> -static inline void add_mm_counter(struct mm_struct *mm, int member, long value)
> -{
> - atomic_long_add(value, &mm->rss_stat.count[member]);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void inc_mm_counter(struct mm_struct *mm, int member)
> -{
> - atomic_long_inc(&mm->rss_stat.count[member]);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void dec_mm_counter(struct mm_struct *mm, int member)
> -{
> - atomic_long_dec(&mm->rss_stat.count[member]);
> -}
> -
> -#else /* !USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS */
> -/*
> - * The mm counters are protected by its page_table_lock,
> - * so can be incremented directly.
> - */
> -static inline void set_mm_counter(struct mm_struct *mm, int member, long value)
> -{
> - mm->rss_stat.count[member] = value;
> -}
> -
> +#else
> static inline unsigned long get_mm_counter(struct mm_struct *mm, int member)
> {
> - return mm->rss_stat.count[member];
> + return atomic_long_read(&mm->rss_stat.count[member]);
> }
> +#endif
>
> static inline void add_mm_counter(struct mm_struct *mm, int member, long value)
> {
> - mm->rss_stat.count[member] += value;
> + atomic_long_add(value, &mm->rss_stat.count[member]);
> }
>
> static inline void inc_mm_counter(struct mm_struct *mm, int member)
> {
> - mm->rss_stat.count[member]++;
> + atomic_long_inc(&mm->rss_stat.count[member]);
> }
>
> static inline void dec_mm_counter(struct mm_struct *mm, int member)
> {
> - mm->rss_stat.count[member]--;
> + atomic_long_dec(&mm->rss_stat.count[member]);
> }
>
> -#endif /* !USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS */
> -
> static inline unsigned long get_mm_rss(struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> return get_mm_counter(mm, MM_FILEPAGES) +
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index ca01ab2..b8ca318 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -205,19 +205,16 @@ enum {
>
> #if USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS && defined(CONFIG_MMU)
> #define SPLIT_RSS_COUNTING
> -struct mm_rss_stat {
> - atomic_long_t count[NR_MM_COUNTERS];
> -};
> /* per-thread cached information, */
> struct task_rss_stat {
> int events; /* for synchronization threshold */
> int count[NR_MM_COUNTERS];
> };
> -#else /* !USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS */
> +#endif /* USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS */
> +
> struct mm_rss_stat {
> - unsigned long count[NR_MM_COUNTERS];
> + atomic_long_t count[NR_MM_COUNTERS];
> };
> -#endif /* !USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS */
>
> struct mm_struct {
> struct vm_area_struct * mmap; /* list of VMAs */
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/