Re: [PATCH] mm: Delete non-atomic mm counter implementation

[Dave Hansen]

On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 15:36 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The problem with having two different types of counters is that
> developers adding new code need to keep in mind whether it's safe to
> use both the atomic and non-atomic implementations. For example, when
> adding new callers of the *_mm_counter() functions a developer needs
> to ensure that those paths are always executed with page_table_lock
> held, in case we're using the non-atomic implementation of mm
> counters.

> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Dave, you might want to take this into your pagetable counters series
> so that you only need to worry about atomic mm counters.

Thanks for doing the patch.  I'll certainly pick it up and submit it
alongside my stuff unless Andrew picks it up first.

Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/