Re: [PATCHv4 2/7] ethtool: Call ethtool's get/set_settingscallbacks with cleaned data

[Ben Hutchings]

On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 09:34 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:32:38PM -0700, David Decotigny wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/net/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> > @@ -237,13 +237,12 @@ stmmac_set_pauseparam(struct net_device *netdev,
> >  
> >  	if (phy->autoneg) {
> >  		if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> > -			struct ethtool_cmd cmd;
> > +			struct ethtool_cmd cmd = { .cmd = ETHTOOL_SSET };
> >  			/* auto-negotiation automatically restarted */
> > -			cmd.cmd = ETHTOOL_NWAY_RST;
> 
> Why did you change ETHTOOL_NWAY_RST to ETHTOOL_SSET ?

Because the function it's calling is an implementation of ETHTOOL_SSET,
not ETHTOOL_NWAY_RST.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/