Re: [PATCHv4 2/7] ethtool: Call ethtool's get/set_settings callbackswith cleaned data
From: David Decotigny
Date: Thu Apr 28 2011 - 11:17:03 EST
Hi,
Stanislaw, as Ben mentions, it's calling phy_ethtool_sset() which is
certainly meant to be an ETHTOOL_SSET op (from its name and comments)
even though its current implementation doesn't actually care for the
value of the cmd field.
Regards,
--
David Decotigny
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:32:38PM -0700, David Decotigny wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/net/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
>> @@ -237,13 +237,12 @@ stmmac_set_pauseparam(struct net_device *netdev,
>>
>> if (phy->autoneg) {
>> if (netif_running(netdev)) {
>> - struct ethtool_cmd cmd;
>> + struct ethtool_cmd cmd = { .cmd = ETHTOOL_SSET };
>> /* auto-negotiation automatically restarted */
>> - cmd.cmd = ETHTOOL_NWAY_RST;
>
> Why did you change ETHTOOL_NWAY_RST to ETHTOOL_SSET ?
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/