Re: [PATCH v3] x86, vt-d: enable x2apic opt out

[David Woodhouse]

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 05:18 +0100, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> Do we want an actual WARN there, complete with stack traceback and
> all?
> 
> Or did you intend a pr_warn or printk(KERN_WARNING or similar?

The traceback has been very useful in other BIOS issues, because it gets
tracked and counted on kerneloops.org along with platform
identification. So we have been able to track down the major offenders
of some of the most egregious BIOS stupidities and make *some* progress
on getting them to improve the untested dross they habitually turn out.

On *this* occasion perhaps a printk might suffice. After all, this
X2APIC_OPT_OUT was invented specifically as a way to allow the BIOS
engineers to get away without fixing their bugs. But then again, it
would also be useful to track how many people are doing it, and I cannot
think of a *legitimate* reason for a BIOS having to set it. So on
balance I'm happier with the WARN().

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/