Re: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 26 May 2011, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:06:16PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> 
> > > What do you want to do with with the various for-next branches?
> 
> > > Do you want to queue things into your tree before hitting for-next?
> 
> > The stuff which gets pulled in from the various suppliers is
> > aggregated in a separate for -next branch.
> 
> I think the question is about the existing -next branches people already
> have - should they contain code that hasn't yet gone to you guys?  We're
> doing that for audio at the minute (having subtrees in -next directly)
> and it's pretty helpful for miniising hassle for the maintainers of the
> core tree.

We obviously talk about arch/arm/[mach|plat]* stuff, drivers/ sound/
etc. should go through the relevant maintainer trees.

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/