Re: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:33:55AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I think the question is about the existing -next branches people already
> > have - should they contain code that hasn't yet gone to you guys?  We're
> > doing that for audio at the minute (having subtrees in -next directly)
> > and it's pretty helpful for miniising hassle for the maintainers of the
> > core tree.

> We obviously talk about arch/arm/[mach|plat]* stuff, drivers/ sound/
> etc. should go through the relevant maintainer trees.

Right, but the question is what to do with the subtrees that are in
-next currently.  I'm mentioning sound as an example of a tree with
subtrees in -next directly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/