Re: [PATCH] Avoid Wunused-but-set warning
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Sun Jul 10 2011 - 14:02:55 EST
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 12:49:20 -0400 Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Raghavendra D Prabhu
> >>> <rprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> I am seeing Wunused-but-set warning while make nconfig. Looks like
> >>>> active_menu is not used. Removing it fixes the warning.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >> Out of curiosity, what is your status to ACK such patch ?
> >
> > What kind of status do you need to ACK such a simple patch?
> >
> As per Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
>
> <<
> 13) When to use Acked-by: and Cc:
> The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the
> development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path.
>
> If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a
> patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can
> arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog.
>
> Acked-by: is often used by the maintainer of the affected code when that
> maintainer neither contributed to nor forwarded the patch.
> >>
>
> That said, it is not a strong requirement... unfortunately. So, let's
> have some fun and go ACK thousand of trivial patch just to generate
> traffic on the LKML and give myself self-importance :-)
Acked-by: is mostly used as a weak version of Reviewed-by:
and the "definition" in SubmittingPatches is not accurate IMO.
I.e., it can be used by anyone.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/