Re: [PATCH v3] fs, dlm: don't do pointless NULL check, use kzallocand fix order of arguments

[Jesper Juhl]

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, David Teigland wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:54:31PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > In fs/dlm/lock.c in the dlm_scan_waiters() function there are 3 small
> > issues:
> > 
> > 1) There's no need to test the return value of the allocation and do a
> > memset if is succeedes. Just use kzalloc() to obtain zeroed memory.
> > 
> > 2) Since kfree() handles NULL pointers gracefully, the test of
> > 'warned' against NULL before the kfree() after the loop is completely
> > pointless. Remove it.
> > 
> > 3) The arguments to kmalloc() (now kzalloc()) were swapped. Thanks to
> > Dr. David Alan Gilbert for pointing this out.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks, I pushed this and a patch for the other swapped kmalloc to the
> next branch.
> Dave
> 
Ok, thanks, then I won't bother updating my patch with that other kmalloc.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>       http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/