Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen)

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Aug 04 2011 - 15:36:55 EST



* Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:25:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
> xen has lots of build errors and warnings (all on x86_64).
>
> CC arch/x86/xen/setup.o
> In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:42,
> from arch/x86/xen/setup.c:19:
> include/trace/events/xen.h:31: warning: 'struct multicall_entry' declared inside parameter list
> include/trace/events/xen.h:31: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> include/trace/events/xen.h:31: warning: 'struct multicall_entry' declared inside parameter list
> include/trace/events/xen.h:31: warning: 'struct multicall_entry' declared inside parameter list
> include/trace/events/xen.h:31: warning: 'struct multicall_entry' declared inside parameter list
> In file included from arch/x86/xen/setup.c:19:
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h: In function 'MULTI_fpu_taskswitch':
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:465: warning: passing argument 1 of 'trace_xen_mc_entry' from incompatible pointer type
> include/trace/events/xen.h:48: note: expected 'struct multicall_entry *' but argument is of type 'struct multicall_entry *'
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h: In function 'MULTI_update_va_mapping':
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:483: warning: passing argument 1 of 'trace_xen_mc_entry' from incompatible pointer type
> include/trace/events/xen.h:48: note: expected 'struct multicall_entry *' but argument is of type 'struct multicall_entry *'
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h: In function 'MULTI_grant_table_op':
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:495: warning: passing argument 1 of 'trace_xen_mc_entry' from incompatible pointer type
> include/trace/events/xen.h:48: note: expected 'struct multicall_entry *' but argument is of type 'struct multicall_entry *'
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h: In function 'MULTI_update_va_mapping_otherdomain':
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:516: warning: passing argument 1 of 'trace_xen_mc_entry' from incompatible pointer type
> include/trace/events/xen.h:48: note: expected 'struct multicall_entry *' but argument is of type 'struct multicall_entry *'
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h: In function 'MULTI_update_descriptor':
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:534: warning: passing argument 1 of 'trace_xen_mc_entry' from incompatible pointer type
> include/trace/events/xen.h:48: note: expected 'struct multicall_entry *' but argument is of type 'struct multicall_entry *'
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h: In function 'MULTI_memory_op':
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:544: warning: passing argument 1 of 'trace_xen_mc_entry' from incompatible pointer type
> include/trace/events/xen.h:48: note: expected 'struct multicall_entry *' but argument is of type 'struct multicall_entry *'
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h: In function 'MULTI_mmu_update':
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:557: warning: passing argument 1 of 'trace_xen_mc_entry' from incompatible pointer type
> include/trace/events/xen.h:48: note: expected 'struct multicall_entry *' but argument is of type 'struct multicall_entry *'
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h: In function 'MULTI_mmuext_op':
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:570: warning: passing argument 1 of 'trace_xen_mc_entry' from incompatible pointer type
> include/trace/events/xen.h:48: note: expected 'struct multicall_entry *' but argument is of type 'struct multicall_entry *'
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h: In function 'MULTI_set_gdt':
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:580: warning: passing argument 1 of 'trace_xen_mc_entry' from incompatible pointer type
> include/trace/events/xen.h:48: note: expected 'struct multicall_entry *' but argument is of type 'struct multicall_entry *'
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h: In function 'MULTI_stack_switch':
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:591: warning: passing argument 1 of 'trace_xen_mc_entry' from incompatible pointer type
> include/trace/events/xen.h:48: note: expected 'struct multicall_entry *' but argument is of type 'struct multicall_entry *'
> CC arch/x86/xen/multicalls.o
> In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:42,
> from arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c:26:
> include/trace/events/xen.h:31: warning: 'struct multicall_entry' declared inside parameter list
> include/trace/events/xen.h:31: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> include/trace/events/xen.h:31: warning: 'struct multicall_entry' declared inside parameter list
> include/trace/events/xen.h:31: warning: 'struct multicall_entry' declared inside parameter list
> include/trace/events/xen.h:31: warning: 'struct multicall_entry' declared inside parameter list

These build failures are still triggering upstream:

arch/x86/xen/trace.c:44:2: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
arch/x86/xen/trace.c:44:2: error: (near initialization for âxen_hypercall_namesâ)
arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:1: error: â__HYPERVISOR_arch_4â undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:2: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:2: error: (near initialization for âxen_hypercall_namesâ)

even after:

b3c4b9825075: xen/tracing: fix compile errors when tracing is disabled.

Btw., that the heck is going on with the commit that introduced the
build failure:

commit bd9ddc875b6659f9f74dcfd285c472bc58041abd
Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon Jun 20 17:52:13 2011 -0700
Commit: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Mon Jul 18 15:43:46 2011 -0700

It was apparently rebased shortly before the merge window and sent to
Linus 3 days later, with little to no linux-next testing ...

I'm absolutely unhappy about how the Xen tree is being run. It's
using a sloppy, crappy workflow and it is producing crap.

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/