Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf, x86: Implement IBS interrupt handler

[Don Zickus]

On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:55:19AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > I tried looking into but everytime I applied workarounds for Intel 
> > errata I wound up with more unknown NMIs and proving that a couple 
> > of them worked (with trace_printks) seemed elusive.  I got 
> > frustrated and left it alone.
> > 
> > But yeah, Intel's perf has so many errata that I think if you kick 
> > the box while running perf you can generate an unknown NMI.
> 
> Hence the only sane approach is to just tolerate spurious NMIs and 
> only annoy the user with them if there's *way* too many of them or 
> so.

That may work if we can determine if the user is running perf or not.  But
on older systems (like pre-Nehalem), sometimes the only way a system can
signal a platform error is through a single unknown NMI.  I would be
afraid we might lose one of those if we 'tolerate' unknown NMIs.

So far I have only noticed perf generating 'unknown NMIs' on high volume
usage (like multiple counters).  For the casual user it has been ok so
far.

Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/