Re: [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386

From: richard -rw- weinberger
Date: Thu Aug 11 2011 - 08:13:28 EST

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>> Fixed and pushed (um-header.git #master); however, looking around that area
>> shows more races ;-/
> Such as, for example, seriously broken handling of free_winch(): delaying
> free_irq() until after return from IRQ handler is nice, but not enough -
> freeing struct winch itself (or winch->stack, for that matter) is also best
> left until after free_irq().  Normal way to do that is schedule_work()...
> Fixed and pushed...
> Folks, I don't know what to do with all that stuff; as far as I'm concerned
> the ideal variant would be to have functioning git tree maintained by Richard.
> Is that possible?  I can ask to start pulling um-header.git into linux-next,
> but I would very much prefer to avoid that, TYVM...  If nothing else, ACK/NAK
> on the stuff in there should be done by architecture maintainer(s).

Sorry for the delay.
Writing my theses consumes a lot of my time...

I've already started reviewing and testing your changes.
Currently they life in my local git repo.
But a repo is on the way!

Later I'll submit all changes to akpm.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at