Re: [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, notSUBARCH_i386
From: Al Viro
Date: Thu Aug 11 2011 - 00:23:33 EST
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Fixed and pushed (um-header.git #master); however, looking around that area
> shows more races ;-/
Such as, for example, seriously broken handling of free_winch(): delaying
free_irq() until after return from IRQ handler is nice, but not enough -
freeing struct winch itself (or winch->stack, for that matter) is also best
left until after free_irq(). Normal way to do that is schedule_work()...
Fixed and pushed...
Folks, I don't know what to do with all that stuff; as far as I'm concerned
the ideal variant would be to have functioning git tree maintained by Richard.
Is that possible? I can ask to start pulling um-header.git into linux-next,
but I would very much prefer to avoid that, TYVM... If nothing else, ACK/NAK
on the stuff in there should be done by architecture maintainer(s).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/