Re: [PATCH] mm: Switch NUMA_BUILD and COMPACTION_BUILD to newIS_ENABLED() syntax

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Thu Aug 11 2011 - 09:01:17 EST

On Thu 11-08-11 14:51:33, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 10-08-11 17:12:40, Michal Marek wrote:
> > Introduced in 3.1-rc1, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) expands to a true value
> > iff CONFIG_NUMA is set. This makes it easier to grep for code that
> > depends on CONFIG_NUMA.

I have just looked closer at all available macros. Wouldn't it make more
sense to use IS_BUILTIN instead? Both symbols can be only on or off.
Not that it would make any difference in the end. I even like IS_ENABLED
naming more.
Michal Hocko
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at