RE: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: Fix <mach/gpio.h> to have necessary#includes

[Stephen Warren]

Russell King wrote at Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:36 PM:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:05:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Without this, EINVAL isn't defined, and type bool isn't declared.
> > This leads to compilation failures.
> 
> An alternative approach would be to convert tegra to be able to use
> the gpiolib __gpio_to_irq() for the on-SoC stuff, and eliminate
> irq_to_gpio().
> 
> Would it be possible to do that instead?

That should work too.

I posted a couple patches last Friday to remove irq_to_gpio:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/5/343
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/5/342

Later in the thread, you said you would merge them into your branch to
avoid merge conflicts with the other GPIO work you were doing.

For gpio_to_irq, yes, I believe we get rid of it pretty easily; we'd
just need to implement gpio-tegra.c's gpio_chip.to_irq function. Should
I cook up a patch based on top of linux-next plus the two patches above
to do that instead?

Thanks.

-- 
nvpublic

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/