Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: Fix <mach/gpio.h> to have necessary#includes

From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Thu Aug 11 2011 - 16:02:37 EST


On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:49:47PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Russell King wrote at Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:36 PM:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:05:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > Without this, EINVAL isn't defined, and type bool isn't declared.
> > > This leads to compilation failures.
> >
> > An alternative approach would be to convert tegra to be able to use
> > the gpiolib __gpio_to_irq() for the on-SoC stuff, and eliminate
> > irq_to_gpio().
> >
> > Would it be possible to do that instead?
>
> That should work too.
>
> I posted a couple patches last Friday to remove irq_to_gpio:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/5/343
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/5/342
>
> Later in the thread, you said you would merge them into your branch to
> avoid merge conflicts with the other GPIO work you were doing.

I suggested it would be a good idea. Now that I've published those
changes, any chance of having some updated patches in the patch system
please?

> For gpio_to_irq, yes, I believe we get rid of it pretty easily; we'd
> just need to implement gpio-tegra.c's gpio_chip.to_irq function. Should
> I cook up a patch based on top of linux-next plus the two patches above
> to do that instead?

Yes please, again eventually to the patch system once Grant has acked it
to avoid the otherwise certain conflicts.

Thanks for doing this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/