Re: [PATCH 3/3] compaction accouting fix

From: Johannes Weiner
Date: Wed Aug 31 2011 - 07:37:56 EST


On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:37:43AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> I saw the following accouting of compaction during test of the series.
>
> compact_blocks_moved 251
> compact_pages_moved 44
>
> It's very awkward to me although it's possbile because it means we try to compact 251 blocks
> but it just migrated 44 pages. As further investigation, I found isolate_migratepages doesn't
> isolate any pages but it returns ISOLATE_SUCCESS and then, it just increases compact_blocks_moved
> but doesn't increased compact_pages_moved.
>
> This patch makes accouting of compaction works only in case of success of isolation.
>
> CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> CC: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx>

It's a teensy-bit awkward that isolate_migratepages() can return
success without actually isolating any new pages, just because there
are still some pages left from a previous run (cc->nr_migratepages is
maintained across isolation calls).

Maybe isolate_migratepages() should just return an error if compaction
should really be aborted and 0 otherwise, and have compact_zone()
always check for cc->nr_migratepages itself?

if (isolate_migratepages(zone, cc) < 0) {
ret = COMPACT_PARTIAL;
goto out;
}

if (!cc->nr_migratepages)
continue;

...

Just a nit-pick, though. If you don't agree, just leave it as is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/