Re: [PATCH][mm/memory.c]: transparent hugepage check conditionmissed

From: Guan Jun He
Date: Mon Oct 31 2011 - 06:08:17 EST



Excuse me! I got the one email sent 6 times!

best,
Guanjun

>>> On 10/31/2011 at 05:02 PM, in message
<1320051775-13992-1-git-send-email-gjhe@xxxxxxxx>, Guanjun He <gjhe@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> For the transparent hugepage module still does not support
> tmpfs and cache,the check condition should always be checked
> to make sure that it only affect the anonymous maps, the
> original check condition missed this, this patch is to fix this.
> Otherwise,the hugepage may affect the file-backed maps,
> then the cache for the small-size pages will be unuseful,
> and till now there is still no implementation for hugepage's cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guanjun He <gjhe@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index a56e3ba..79b85fe 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3475,7 +3475,8 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct
> vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)) {
> if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE &&
> !pmd_write(orig_pmd) &&
> - !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd))
> + !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd) &&
> + !vma->vm_ops)
> return do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address,
> pmd, orig_pmd);
> return 0;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/