Re: [PATCH 14/17] UAPI: Make linux/patchkey.h easier to parse

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi David,

On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:57:57 +0000 David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Actually, it doesn't seem to be necessary.  The header splitter managed to cope
> without it and did the right thing.  I think what happened was that the
> splitter didn't recognise the _LINUX_PATCHKEY_H_INDIRECT thing as a reinclusion
> guard, so it just tossed that into the UAPI header, then recognised the
> _LINUX_PATCHKEY_H thing as the reinclusion guard and proceeded from there.
> 
> Would you prefer that I remove that from the comments or would you prefer that
> I leave things unchanged?

Well, the comments should really reflect the patch, right?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature