Re: [PATCH 14/17] UAPI: Make linux/patchkey.h easier to parse

[David Howells]

David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Is this part missing, or no longer needed?
> 
> It seems to have got lost somewhere.  Thanks for catching it.

Actually, it doesn't seem to be necessary.  The header splitter managed to cope
without it and did the right thing.  I think what happened was that the
splitter didn't recognise the _LINUX_PATCHKEY_H_INDIRECT thing as a reinclusion
guard, so it just tossed that into the UAPI header, then recognised the
_LINUX_PATCHKEY_H thing as the reinclusion guard and proceeded from there.

Would you prefer that I remove that from the comments or would you prefer that
I leave things unchanged?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/